I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in SERLI v. TURKEY.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2024-11-05
  • Communication date: 2021-09-10
  • Application number(s): 10419/20
  • Country:   TUR
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-2, 6-3-b, 8, 8-1, 14
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.881994
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

Published on 27 September 2021 The application concerns the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer.
The applicant was detained in prison at the time of lodging this application.
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant alleges that a court judgment transmitted by his lawyer and pronounced in a case similar to his own, was seized by the prison administration.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 32‐54, Series A no.
233 and Ekinci and Akalın v. Turkey, no.
77097/01, § 47, 30 January 2007)?
Published on 27 September 2021 The application concerns the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer.
The applicant was detained in prison at the time of lodging this application.
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant alleges that a court judgment transmitted by his lawyer and pronounced in a case similar to his own, was seized by the prison administration.

Judgment