I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in THE CHIEF RABBINATE OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN IZMIR v. TURKEY.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2024-12-12
  • Communication date: 2019-12-18
  • Application number(s): 1574/12
  • Country:   TUR
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): P1-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
    Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
    Degrading treatment)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.556537
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The applicant is the Chief Rabbinate of the Jewish Community in Izmir.
The application concerns the registration of a property, which the applicant claims to be in its use since 1605, in the name of the Treasury, and the domestic courts’ dismissal of the applicant’s claim to have it registered in its name.
Following a cadastral work carried out in 1930, the property at issue was entered in the land register with an annotation noting that it was a rabbinate.
The owner part was left blank.
By a zoning act in 1989, it was registered as a block comprising two separate plots; plots 10 and 11 of block no.
7378.
In 2000 the applicant lodged an action before the Izmir Cadastral Court, claiming the registration of both plots in its name in the land register.
That case was dismissed by the domestic court, which found that the cadastral works needed to be completed before it could reach a decision.
That judgment became final in 2003.
As a result of the cadastral work carried out in 2004, the owner of approximately half of the shares of plot 10 and all of plot 11 was determined as the Treasury, on the grounds that the applicant had not provided the permit from the Directorate of Foundations and the decision of the Committee of Ministers.
The building on plot 11 was found to belong to the applicant.
Subsequently, in 2005 the applicant lodged another action, this time claiming the registration of the property in its name on account of acquisitive prescription.
On 21 March 2008 the Izmir Cadastral Court dismissed the case in line with the findings of the last cadastral work, concluding that the impugned plots had been registered to the Treasury due to the applicant’s failure to provide the required documents from the Directorate of Foundations and the Committee of Ministers, both of which it considered were required for the registration of the property in the applicant’s name.
The domestic court held that there had not been sufficient proof to support the applicant’s claim to the property and declared that it should be registered in the name of the Treasury, with an annotation in the land register which would state that the owner of the building on plot 11 was the applicant.
On 15 March 2011 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment.
Besides the reasoning provided by the Cadastral Court, the appellate court added that the applicant had also failed to register the property in 1912 and 1913, as required by the Provisional Law on the Legal Persons’ Ownership of Immovable Property dated 1912 (Eşhas-ı Hükmiyenin Emval-ı Gayr-i Menkûleye Tasarruflarına Mahsus Kanun-i Muvakkat).
The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 to the Convention that the registration of the property to the Treasury violated its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
In that connection, the applicant challenges the domestic court’s conclusion regarding the lack of sufficient proof, noting that it has been using the impugned property since 1605.
It also argues, in particular, that it was not clear why the domestic court assessed the ownership of the land and the building separately, and considered the applicant as a foundation.

Judgment

FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF BONDARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Applications nos. 15961/23 and 6 others –
see appended list)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG
12 December 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Bondarenko and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Sârcu, President, Kateřina Šimáčková, Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 21 November 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr Sergiy Mykolayovych Rybiy, a lawyer practising in Dnipro, Ukraine. 3. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
4. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention during the periods indicated in the appended table and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. 7. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‐law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96‐101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 122-41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149‐59, 10 January 2012). 8. In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v. Ukraine (no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. In particular, the Court observes that, in reply to a prima facie case of inadequate conditions of detention, complained of by the applicants, the Government have failed to provide any primary evidence showing cell floor plans and the actual number of inmates during the specific periods of the applicants’ detention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 123, and, for example, Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, 12 September 2024). Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention during the periods indicated in the appended table were inadequate. 10. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. 12. In applications nos. 25817/23, 32960/23 and 32968/23, the applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 13. The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‐law (see, in particular, Sukachov, cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 December 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Sârcu
Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Facility
Start and end date
Duration
Sq. m per inmate
Specific grievances
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[1]
15961/23
29/03/2023
Dmytro Volodymyrovych BONDARENKO
1982

Kryvyy Rig Detention Facility no. 3
20/01/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.7 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of toiletries, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water
7,500
25817/23
05/06/2023
Sergiy Ivanovych DERKACH
1968

Kryviy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
19/04/2023
pending
More than 1 year(s) and
5 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of potable water
4,000
32387/23
06/08/2023
Oleksandr Volodymyrovych ZALYEVSKYY
1984

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
09/11/2012
pending
More than 11 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 1 day(s)
3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
7,500
32960/23
11/08/2023
Mykola Sergiyovych ANEDCHENKO
1977

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/08/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
2 month(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,500
32962/23
11/08/2023
Oleksandr Anatoliyovych KOZMICH
1971

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
24/01/2014
pending
More than 10 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 16 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
32968/23
10/08/2023
Vyacheslav Vitaliyovych RUBALSKYY
1983

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/10/2019
pending
More than 5 year(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
35613/23
07/09/2023
Yuriy Valeriyovych BESSONOV
1987

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/07/2021
pending
More than 3 year(s) and
3 month(s) and 6 day(s)
3.8 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,300

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF BONDARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Applications nos. 15961/23 and 6 others –
see appended list)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG
12 December 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Bondarenko and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Sârcu, President, Kateřina Šimáčková, Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 21 November 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr Sergiy Mykolayovych Rybiy, a lawyer practising in Dnipro, Ukraine. 3. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
4. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention during the periods indicated in the appended table and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. 7. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‐law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96‐101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 122-41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149‐59, 10 January 2012). 8. In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v. Ukraine (no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. In particular, the Court observes that, in reply to a prima facie case of inadequate conditions of detention, complained of by the applicants, the Government have failed to provide any primary evidence showing cell floor plans and the actual number of inmates during the specific periods of the applicants’ detention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 123, and, for example, Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, 12 September 2024). Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention during the periods indicated in the appended table were inadequate. 10. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. 12. In applications nos. 25817/23, 32960/23 and 32968/23, the applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 13. The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‐law (see, in particular, Sukachov, cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 December 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Sârcu
Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Facility
Start and end date
Duration
Sq. m per inmate
Specific grievances
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[1]
15961/23
29/03/2023
Dmytro Volodymyrovych BONDARENKO
1982

Kryvyy Rig Detention Facility no. 3
20/01/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.7 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of toiletries, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water
7,500
25817/23
05/06/2023
Sergiy Ivanovych DERKACH
1968

Kryviy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
19/04/2023
pending
More than 1 year(s) and
5 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of potable water
4,000
32387/23
06/08/2023
Oleksandr Volodymyrovych ZALYEVSKYY
1984

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
09/11/2012
pending
More than 11 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 1 day(s)
3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
7,500
32960/23
11/08/2023
Mykola Sergiyovych ANEDCHENKO
1977

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/08/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
2 month(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,500
32962/23
11/08/2023
Oleksandr Anatoliyovych KOZMICH
1971

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
24/01/2014
pending
More than 10 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 16 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
32968/23
10/08/2023
Vyacheslav Vitaliyovych RUBALSKYY
1983

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/10/2019
pending
More than 5 year(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
35613/23
07/09/2023
Yuriy Valeriyovych BESSONOV
1987

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/07/2021
pending
More than 3 year(s) and
3 month(s) and 6 day(s)
3.8 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,300

No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Facility
Start and end date
Duration
Sq. m per inmate
Specific grievances
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[1]
15961/23
29/03/2023
Dmytro Volodymyrovych BONDARENKO
1982

Kryvyy Rig Detention Facility no. 3
20/01/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.7 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of toiletries, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water
7,500
25817/23
05/06/2023
Sergiy Ivanovych DERKACH
1968

Kryviy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
19/04/2023
pending
More than 1 year(s) and
5 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of potable water
4,000
32387/23
06/08/2023
Oleksandr Volodymyrovych ZALYEVSKYY
1984

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
09/11/2012
pending
More than 11 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 1 day(s)
3 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
7,500
32960/23
11/08/2023
Mykola Sergiyovych ANEDCHENKO
1977

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/08/2018
pending
More than 6 year(s) and
2 month(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,500
32962/23
11/08/2023
Oleksandr Anatoliyovych KOZMICH
1971

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
24/01/2014
pending
More than 10 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 16 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
32968/23
10/08/2023
Vyacheslav Vitaliyovych RUBALSKYY
1983

Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/10/2019
pending
More than 5 year(s) and
6 day(s)
3.9 m2
overcrowding, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, poor quality of food
7,500
35613/23
07/09/2023
Yuriy Valeriyovych BESSONOV
1987

Kryvyy Rih Detention Facility no. 3
04/07/2021
pending
More than 3 year(s) and
3 month(s) and 6 day(s)
3.8 m2
overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light
7,300
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.