I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in SIDDI v. ITALY.


  • Judgment date: 2010-09-21
  • Communication date: 2018-02-16
  • Application number(s): 16108/11
  • Country:   ITA
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): P1-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect)
    Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect)
  • Result: Violation

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.649198
  • Prediction: No violation
  • Inconsistent


 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s land through the application of the constructive-expropriation rule (“accessione invertita” or “occupazione acquisitiva”) by the domestic courts.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant been deprived of her possessions in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 (see, amongst many other authorities, Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no.
58858/00, 8 December 2005; Rivera and di Bonaventura v. Italy, no.
63869/00, 14 June 2011; and De Caterina and Others v. Italy, no.
65278/01, 28 June 2011)?