I correctly predicted that there was a violation of human rights in DEGTYAREV v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications.
Information
- Judgment date: 2025-01-16
- Communication date: 2024-09-05
- Application number(s): 19573/21;42889/21;50355/21;53118/21;58243/21;58812/21;3016/22;3826/22;7117/22;37072/22;40389/22
- Country: RUS
- Relevant ECHR article(s): 8, 8-1, 13, 14, P1-3
- Conclusion:
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment
Inhuman treatment)
Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections - {general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote) - Result: Violation SEE FINAL JUDGMENT
JURI Prediction
- Probability: 0.915831
- Prediction: Violation
Consistent
Legend
Communication text used for prediction
Published on 30 September 2024 (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 September 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.
This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see N.T.
v. Russia, no.
14727/11, 2 June 2020).
APPENDIX – List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention(inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime) No.
Application no.
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date of detention under strict regime Other complaints under well-established case-law 19573/21* 05/03/2021 Aleksandr Anatolyevich DEGTYAREV 1988 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 20/12/2010 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers and blanket ban on voting for the convicts, Prot.
1 Art.
3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections - refusal to participate in legislative elections on 13/09/2020 due to the blanket constitutional ban on electoral rights of convicts 42889/21* 02/08/2021 Grigoriy Vasilyevich AKOPYAN 1977 IK-2 Perm Region 08/08/2004 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 50355/21 23/09/2021 Aleksandr Leonidovich ZYKOV 1963 IK-6 Orenburg Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 22/03/2002 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 53118/21* 20/06/2022 Dokka Sulumbekovich DZHANTEMIROV 1974 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 29/06/2009 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 58243/21 29/10/2021 Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN 1970 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 21/07/2006 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 58812/21* 24/10/2021 Arbi Khamzatovich DANDAYEV 1974 Mukhammaz Arbiyevich Dandayev Grozny IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 17/04/2019 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 3016/22 23/12/2021 Radzhu Khamzanovich KANTAYEV 1982 IK-2 Perm Region 28/06/2005 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 3826/22 08/12/2021 Konstantin Nikolayevich BREZGIN 1971 IK-6 Orenburg Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 01/08/2001 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 7117/22* 14/12/2021 Aleksey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV 1972 IK-2 Perm Region 13/10/1995 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 37072/22* 14/07/2022 Roman Yevgenyevich SHAGOV 1972 IK-2 Perm Region 25/10/1999 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 40389/22 10/07/2022 Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ 1971 Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV 1984 Denis Aleksandrovich KARAKOV 1982 Petr Aleksandrovich TARASOV 1988 Yuliya Sergeyevna Gaynutdinova Kazan IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 23/08/2020, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Kalinin) 26/04/2018, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Cherkasov) 15/05/2020, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Karakov) 01/04/2018, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Tarasov) Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers Published on 30 September 2024 (see table appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 September 2024, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.
This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed table, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see N.T.
v. Russia, no.
14727/11, 2 June 2020).
APPENDIX – List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention(inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime) No.
Application no.
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date of detention under strict regime Other complaints under well-established case-law 19573/21* 05/03/2021 Aleksandr Anatolyevich DEGTYAREV 1988 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 20/12/2010 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers and blanket ban on voting for the convicts, Prot.
1 Art.
3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections - refusal to participate in legislative elections on 13/09/2020 due to the blanket constitutional ban on electoral rights of convicts 42889/21* 02/08/2021 Grigoriy Vasilyevich AKOPYAN 1977 IK-2 Perm Region 08/08/2004 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 50355/21 23/09/2021 Aleksandr Leonidovich ZYKOV 1963 IK-6 Orenburg Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 22/03/2002 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 53118/21* 20/06/2022 Dokka Sulumbekovich DZHANTEMIROV 1974 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 29/06/2009 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 58243/21 29/10/2021 Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN 1970 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region 21/07/2006 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 58812/21* 24/10/2021 Arbi Khamzatovich DANDAYEV 1974 Mukhammaz Arbiyevich Dandayev Grozny IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 17/04/2019 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law- as regards the prison regime for the lifers 3016/22 23/12/2021 Radzhu Khamzanovich KANTAYEV 1982 IK-2 Perm Region 28/06/2005 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 3826/22 08/12/2021 Konstantin Nikolayevich BREZGIN 1971 IK-6 Orenburg Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 01/08/2001 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 7117/22* 14/12/2021 Aleksey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV 1972 IK-2 Perm Region 13/10/1995 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 37072/22* 14/07/2022 Roman Yevgenyevich SHAGOV 1972 IK-2 Perm Region 25/10/1999 and ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers 40389/22 10/07/2022 Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ 1971 Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV 1984 Denis Aleksandrovich KARAKOV 1982 Petr Aleksandrovich TARASOV 1988 Yuliya Sergeyevna Gaynutdinova Kazan IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 23/08/2020, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Kalinin) 26/04/2018, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Cherkasov) 15/05/2020, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Karakov) 01/04/2018, ongoing at least as of the date of lodging the application (Mr Tarasov) Art.
13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - as regards the prison regime for the lifers
Judgment
THIRD SECTIONCASE OF DEGTYAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 19573/21 and 10 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 January 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Degtyarev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Kovatcheva, President, Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, Mateja Đurović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 5 December 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‐73, 17 January 2023). 7. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 3 of the Convention. 8. The general principles regarding the prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the context of deprivation of liberty, as guaranteed by Article 3 of the Convention, have been stated in a number of the Court’s previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96-100, 20 October 2016, and Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). 9. In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ rights were violated as a result of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. 12. The applicant in application no. 19573/21 submitted other complaint which also raised an issue under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). This complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor is it inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, it must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it also discloses a violation of the Protocol in the light of its findings in Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, §§ 47-112, 4 July 2013, regarding automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners’ voting rights. 13. The applicants further raised the issue of the lack of effective remedies under Article 13 of the Convention in respect of their complaints. Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicants and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Ionov and Klimenko v. Russia [Committee], nos. 9289/15 33932/17, § 11, 30 March 2023). 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‐law (see, in particular, N.T., cited above, § 61), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 January 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Facility
Start and end date of detention under strict regime
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‐pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
19573/21
05/03/2021
Aleksandr Anatolyevich DEGTYAREV
1988
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
20/12/2010 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections – impossibility for the applicant to vote in the State Duma (parliamentary) elections on 13/09/2020 due to the blanket constitutional ban on electoral rights of convicts
3,000
42889/21
02/08/2021
Grigoriy Vasilyevich AKOPYAN
1977
IK-2
Perm Region
08/08/2004 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
50355/21
23/09/2021
Aleksandr Leonidovich ZYKOV
1963
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
K-6
Khabarovsk Region
22/03/2002 and ongoing as of the date of lodging the application
3,000
53118/21
20/06/2022
Dokka Sulumbekovich DZHANTEMIROV
1974
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
29/06/2009 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58243/21
29/10/2021
Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN
1970
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
21/07/2006 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58812/21
24/10/2021
Arbi Khamzatovich DANDAYEV
1974
Dandayev Mukhammaz Arbiyevich
Grozny
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
17/04/2019 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3016/22
23/12/2021
Radzhu Khamzanovich KANTAYEV
1982
IK-2
Perm Region
28/06/2005 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3826/22
08/12/2021
Konstantin Nikolayevich BREZGIN
1971
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
01/08/2001 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
7117/22
14/12/2021
Aleksey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
13/10/1995 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
37072/22
14/07/2022
Roman Yevgenyevich SHAGOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
25/10/1999 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
40389/22
10/07/2022
(4 applicants)
Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ
1971
Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV
1984
Denis Aleksandrovich KARAKOV
1982
Petr Aleksandrovich TARASOV
1988
Gaynutdinova Yuliya Sergeyevna
Kazan
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
23/08/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Kalinin)
26/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Cherkasov)
15/05/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Karakov)
01/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Tarasov)
3,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. THIRD SECTION
CASE OF DEGTYAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 19573/21 and 10 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 January 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Degtyarev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Kovatcheva, President, Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, Mateja Đurović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 5 December 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‐73, 17 January 2023). 7. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 3 of the Convention. 8. The general principles regarding the prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the context of deprivation of liberty, as guaranteed by Article 3 of the Convention, have been stated in a number of the Court’s previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96-100, 20 October 2016, and Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). 9. In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ rights were violated as a result of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. 12. The applicant in application no. 19573/21 submitted other complaint which also raised an issue under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). This complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor is it inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, it must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it also discloses a violation of the Protocol in the light of its findings in Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, §§ 47-112, 4 July 2013, regarding automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners’ voting rights. 13. The applicants further raised the issue of the lack of effective remedies under Article 13 of the Convention in respect of their complaints. Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicants and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Ionov and Klimenko v. Russia [Committee], nos. 9289/15 33932/17, § 11, 30 March 2023). 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‐law (see, in particular, N.T., cited above, § 61), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 January 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Facility
Start and end date of detention under strict regime
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‐pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
19573/21
05/03/2021
Aleksandr Anatolyevich DEGTYAREV
1988
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
20/12/2010 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections – impossibility for the applicant to vote in the State Duma (parliamentary) elections on 13/09/2020 due to the blanket constitutional ban on electoral rights of convicts
3,000
42889/21
02/08/2021
Grigoriy Vasilyevich AKOPYAN
1977
IK-2
Perm Region
08/08/2004 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
50355/21
23/09/2021
Aleksandr Leonidovich ZYKOV
1963
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
K-6
Khabarovsk Region
22/03/2002 and ongoing as of the date of lodging the application
3,000
53118/21
20/06/2022
Dokka Sulumbekovich DZHANTEMIROV
1974
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
29/06/2009 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58243/21
29/10/2021
Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN
1970
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
21/07/2006 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58812/21
24/10/2021
Arbi Khamzatovich DANDAYEV
1974
Dandayev Mukhammaz Arbiyevich
Grozny
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
17/04/2019 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3016/22
23/12/2021
Radzhu Khamzanovich KANTAYEV
1982
IK-2
Perm Region
28/06/2005 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3826/22
08/12/2021
Konstantin Nikolayevich BREZGIN
1971
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
01/08/2001 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
7117/22
14/12/2021
Aleksey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
13/10/1995 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
37072/22
14/07/2022
Roman Yevgenyevich SHAGOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
25/10/1999 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
40389/22
10/07/2022
(4 applicants)
Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ
1971
Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV
1984
Denis Aleksandrovich KARAKOV
1982
Petr Aleksandrovich TARASOV
1988
Gaynutdinova Yuliya Sergeyevna
Kazan
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
23/08/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Kalinin)
26/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Cherkasov)
15/05/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Karakov)
01/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Tarasov)
3,000
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Facility
Start and end date of detention under strict regime
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‐pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
19573/21
05/03/2021
Aleksandr Anatolyevich DEGTYAREV
1988
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
20/12/2010 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections – impossibility for the applicant to vote in the State Duma (parliamentary) elections on 13/09/2020 due to the blanket constitutional ban on electoral rights of convicts
3,000
42889/21
02/08/2021
Grigoriy Vasilyevich AKOPYAN
1977
IK-2
Perm Region
08/08/2004 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
50355/21
23/09/2021
Aleksandr Leonidovich ZYKOV
1963
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
K-6
Khabarovsk Region
22/03/2002 and ongoing as of the date of lodging the application
3,000
53118/21
20/06/2022
Dokka Sulumbekovich DZHANTEMIROV
1974
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
29/06/2009 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58243/21
29/10/2021
Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN
1970
IK-18
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Region
21/07/2006 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
58812/21
24/10/2021
Arbi Khamzatovich DANDAYEV
1974
Dandayev Mukhammaz Arbiyevich
Grozny
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
17/04/2019 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3016/22
23/12/2021
Radzhu Khamzanovich KANTAYEV
1982
IK-2
Perm Region
28/06/2005 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
3826/22
08/12/2021
Konstantin Nikolayevich BREZGIN
1971
IK-6
Orenburg Region;
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
01/08/2001 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
7117/22
14/12/2021
Aleksey Valeryevich MIKHAYLOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
13/10/1995 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
37072/22
14/07/2022
Roman Yevgenyevich SHAGOV
1972
IK-2
Perm Region
25/10/1999 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court
3,000
40389/22
10/07/2022
(4 applicants)
Sergey Nikolayevich KALININ
1971
Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV
1984
Denis Aleksandrovich KARAKOV
1982
Petr Aleksandrovich TARASOV
1988
Gaynutdinova Yuliya Sergeyevna
Kazan
IK-6
Khabarovsk Region
23/08/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Kalinin)
26/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Cherkasov)
15/05/2020 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Karakov)
01/04/2018 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Mr Tarasov)
3,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.