I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in ROSTÁS v. HUNGARY.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2019-04-30
  • Communication date: 2018-09-06
  • Application number(s): 26804/18
  • Country:   HUN
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 3, 6, 6-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention
    Procedure prescribed by law)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.729149
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The application concerns the applicant’s conviction, on 3 October 2014, for attempted murder and other offences.
He was sentenced to actual life imprisonment, meaning that his mandatory pardon proceedings can first take place after having served forty years of imprisonment.
The applicant was born in 1987.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant been deprived of any real prospect of release and thus potentially subjected to inhuman punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the fact that he will not be eligible for the mandatory pardon proceedings before having served forty years of imprisonment (see T.P.
and A.T. v. Hungary, nos.
37871/14 and 73986/14, 4 October 2016)?

Judgment