I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in YÜKSELLER GIDA TİC. SAN. LTD. ŞTİ. v. TURKEY.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2021-01-19
  • Communication date: 2019-02-01
  • Application number(s): 27530/09
  • Country:   TUR
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, P1-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.773193
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The case concerns the amount of the compensation determined by the domestic courts following the de facto expropriation of the applicant’s plot of land.
The applicant complains of a violation of its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 to the Convention, arguing that the domestic courts failed to take account of the findings of the expert reports in calculating the amount of compensation and applied an insufficient interest rate to the compensation awarded.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 to the Convention on account of the domestic court’s calculation of the compensation awarded to him for the de facto expropriation of its land (see Yıltaş Yıldız Turistik Tesisleri A.Ş.
v. Turkey, no.
30502/96, 24 April 2003) and the insufficiency of the interest rate applied to that amount (see Sarıca and Dilaver v. Turkey, no.
11765/05, 27 May 2010)?

Judgment