I correctly predicted that there was a violation of human rights in OOO TRUZHENIK - 89 v. RUSSIA.


  • Judgment date: 2020-11-19
  • Communication date: 2017-04-03
  • Application number(s): 34336/10
  • Country:   RUS
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, P1-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
    No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
    Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment
    Prohibition of torture)
  • Result: Violation

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.655857
  • Prediction: Violation
  • Consistent


 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The applicant, OOO Truzhenik - 89, is a company incorporated under Russian law and based in Yukerch-Keloy, Chechen Republic.
They are represented before the Court by Mr I.Y.
Timishev, a lawyer practising in Nalchik.
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows.
The applicant company sued State Unitary Enterprise “Spetsstroy” of the Ministry of Construction of the Chechen Republic (ГУП «Спецстрой») to obtain payment for service debts.
On 3 November 2009 the Commercial Court of the Chechen Republic awarded the applicant company the equivalent of 492,736 euros (EUR).
The judgment became final on 3 December 2009.
According to the applicant company the judgment has remained unenforced to date.
COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 to the Convention, the applicant company complains about non-enforcement of the court award in their favour.