I correctly predicted that there was a violation of human rights in UGURYAN v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications.
Information
- Judgment date: 2024-01-18
- Communication date: 2023-06-01
- Application number(s): 40018/16
- Country: RUS
- Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, 6-3-d
- Conclusion:
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings
Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) - Result: Violation SEE FINAL JUDGMENT
JURI Prediction
- Probability: 0.752554
- Prediction: Violation
Consistent
Legend
Communication text used for prediction
Published on 26 June 2023 (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 1 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.
This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021).
APPENDIX – List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention(unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents) No.
Application no.
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of test purchase/"operational experiment" Type of offence Specific grievances Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date) Case-law Other complaints under well‐established case-law 40018/16* 29/06/2016 Margar Norikovich UGURYAN 1977 25/11/2014 marijuana lack of incriminating information Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to examine the main prosecution witness P. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant 57467/19* 31/10/2019 Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA 1973 11/09/2018 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 12187/21* 25/02/2021 Yunyuye SHEN 1957 Vitaliy Viktorovich Kulapov Moscow 31/12/2017 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (a) - charges/information about the charges - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese and that prevented him to duly understand the nature of charges against him; Art.
6 (3) (b) - adequate time/facilities for preparation of defence - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese, which prevented the applicant from presenting and defending his position in the first-instance and appeal courts 20488/21* 27/03/2021 Farit Madisovich GAREYEV 1964 Eduard Anatolyevich Arkadyev Vladivostok 29/09/2018 cannabis (hash) oil anonymous/unverified tip, repeated calls, undercover police officer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the app had been previously involved in drug dealing; no telephone tapping; no search in the app’s house, conviction for the drugs transferred during the test purchase, no other episodes Supreme Court of Russia, 25/10/2022 30227/21 21/10/2021 Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV 1975 04/03/2016 ephedrine repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 35368/21 24/06/2021 Maksim Yuryevich NOROK 1979 Vladimir Nikolayevich Boyarko Krasnodar 07/07/2017 marijuana repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 61107/21 09/12/2021 Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV 1959 Andrey Yevgenyevich Golubenko Nea Skiony 22/11/2018 bribe-related crime lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to examine the main prosecution witness B. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant; Art.
6 (3) (d) - failure of the authorities to locate attesting witnesses S. and K. and inability to question them in court in relation to their pre-trial testimony 1497/22* 02/12/2021 Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV 1980 16/11/2017 N-metilefedron fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 2812/22 24/11/2021 Andrey Igorevich DEMIN 1981 Arseniy Sergeyevich Korchagin Yaroslavl 06/12/2018 heroin fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to question main witness for the prosecution, M.
Kh., whose pre-trial testimony was used to convict the applicant 10091/22* 10/02/2022 Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV 1983 05/02/2019 N-methylephedrine fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip Supreme Court of Russia 22/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 14928/22* 20/10/2021 Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV 1983 05/05/2019 heroin anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Published on 26 June 2023 (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 1 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.
This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021).
APPENDIX – List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention(unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents) No.
Application no.
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of test purchase/"operational experiment" Type of offence Specific grievances Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date) Case-law Other complaints under well‐established case-law 40018/16* 29/06/2016 Margar Norikovich UGURYAN 1977 25/11/2014 marijuana lack of incriminating information Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to examine the main prosecution witness P. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant 57467/19* 31/10/2019 Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA 1973 11/09/2018 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 12187/21* 25/02/2021 Yunyuye SHEN 1957 Vitaliy Viktorovich Kulapov Moscow 31/12/2017 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (a) - charges/information about the charges - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese and that prevented him to duly understand the nature of charges against him; Art.
6 (3) (b) - adequate time/facilities for preparation of defence - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese, which prevented the applicant from presenting and defending his position in the first-instance and appeal courts 20488/21* 27/03/2021 Farit Madisovich GAREYEV 1964 Eduard Anatolyevich Arkadyev Vladivostok 29/09/2018 cannabis (hash) oil anonymous/unverified tip, repeated calls, undercover police officer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the app had been previously involved in drug dealing; no telephone tapping; no search in the app’s house, conviction for the drugs transferred during the test purchase, no other episodes Supreme Court of Russia, 25/10/2022 30227/21 21/10/2021 Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV 1975 04/03/2016 ephedrine repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 35368/21 24/06/2021 Maksim Yuryevich NOROK 1979 Vladimir Nikolayevich Boyarko Krasnodar 07/07/2017 marijuana repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 61107/21 09/12/2021 Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV 1959 Andrey Yevgenyevich Golubenko Nea Skiony 22/11/2018 bribe-related crime lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to examine the main prosecution witness B. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant; Art.
6 (3) (d) - failure of the authorities to locate attesting witnesses S. and K. and inability to question them in court in relation to their pre-trial testimony 1497/22* 02/12/2021 Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV 1980 16/11/2017 N-metilefedron fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 2812/22 24/11/2021 Andrey Igorevich DEMIN 1981 Arseniy Sergeyevich Korchagin Yaroslavl 06/12/2018 heroin fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to question main witness for the prosecution, M.
Kh., whose pre-trial testimony was used to convict the applicant 10091/22* 10/02/2022 Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV 1983 05/02/2019 N-methylephedrine fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip Supreme Court of Russia 22/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 14928/22* 20/10/2021 Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV 1983 05/05/2019 heroin anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 No.
Application no.
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of test purchase/"operational experiment" Type of offence Specific grievances Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date) Case-law Other complaints under well‐established case-law 40018/16* 29/06/2016 Margar Norikovich UGURYAN 1977 25/11/2014 marijuana lack of incriminating information Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to examine the main prosecution witness P. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant 57467/19* 31/10/2019 Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA 1973 11/09/2018 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 12187/21* 25/02/2021 Yunyuye SHEN 1957 Vitaliy Viktorovich Kulapov Moscow 31/12/2017 bribe-related offence pressure to proceed with illegal activity Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (a) - charges/information about the charges - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese and that prevented him to duly understand the nature of charges against him; Art.
6 (3) (b) - adequate time/facilities for preparation of defence - The applicant complains that some of the case material was not duly translated from Russian to Chinese, which prevented the applicant from presenting and defending his position in the first-instance and appeal courts 20488/21* 27/03/2021 Farit Madisovich GAREYEV 1964 Eduard Anatolyevich Arkadyev Vladivostok 29/09/2018 cannabis (hash) oil anonymous/unverified tip, repeated calls, undercover police officer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the app had been previously involved in drug dealing; no telephone tapping; no search in the app’s house, conviction for the drugs transferred during the test purchase, no other episodes Supreme Court of Russia, 25/10/2022 30227/21 21/10/2021 Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV 1975 04/03/2016 ephedrine repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 35368/21 24/06/2021 Maksim Yuryevich NOROK 1979 Vladimir Nikolayevich Boyarko Krasnodar 07/07/2017 marijuana repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 61107/21 09/12/2021 Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV 1959 Andrey Yevgenyevich Golubenko Nea Skiony 22/11/2018 bribe-related crime lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.
62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to examine the main prosecution witness B. whose pre-trial testimony was admitted as evidence and used against the applicant; Art.
6 (3) (d) - failure of the authorities to locate attesting witnesses S. and K. and inability to question them in court in relation to their pre-trial testimony 1497/22* 02/12/2021 Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV 1980 16/11/2017 N-metilefedron fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 2812/22 24/11/2021 Andrey Igorevich DEMIN 1981 Arseniy Sergeyevich Korchagin Yaroslavl 06/12/2018 heroin fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 Art.
6 (3) (d) - inability to question main witness for the prosecution, M.
Kh., whose pre-trial testimony was used to convict the applicant 10091/22* 10/02/2022 Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV 1983 05/02/2019 N-methylephedrine fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip Supreme Court of Russia 22/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014 14928/22* 20/10/2021 Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV 1983 05/05/2019 heroin anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021 Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos.
66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021; Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos.
20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
Judgment
FIRST SECTIONCASE OF UGURYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 40018/16 and 9 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Uguryan and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President, Gilberto Felici, Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in ten applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicants complained that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‐73, 17 January 2023). 7. The applicants complained principally that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences which they had been incited by State agents to commit and that their plea of entrapment had not been properly examined in the domestic proceedings. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 8. The Court reiterates that absence in the national legal system of a clear and foreseeable procedure for authorising test purchases of drugs remains a structural problem which exposes applicants to an arbitrary action by the State agents and prevents the domestic courts from conducting an effective judicial review of their entrapment pleas (see Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10 and 2 others, 2 October 2012 and Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021). 9. The Court has consistently found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the deficient existing procedure for authorisation and administration of test purchases of drugs in the respondent State, an issue similar to that in the present case (see Veselov and Others, cited above, §§ 126‐28; Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, §§ 124‐25, 24 April 2014; Lebedev and Others v. Russia, nos. 2500/07 and 4 others, §§ 12‐16, 30 April 2015; and Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06 and 4 others, §§ 17‐21, 27 November 2014). 10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the criminal proceedings against the applicants were incompatible with a notion of a fair trial. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 12. Some applicants submitted other complaints under the Convention. In view of the Court’s findings above, it considers that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints raised by the applicants. 13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Kumitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018), the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present case. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of test purchase/
"operational experiment"
Type of offence
Specific grievances
Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date)
Case-law
40018/16
29/06/2016
Margar Norikovich UGURYAN
1977
25/11/2014
marijuana
lack of incriminating information
Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
57467/19
31/10/2019
Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA
1973
11/09/2018
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
12187/21
25/02/2021
Yunyuye SHEN
1957
Kulapov Vitaliy Viktorovich
Moscow
31/12/2017
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022. 30227/21
21/10/2021
Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV
1975
04/03/2016
ephedrine
repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale
Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
35368/21
24/06/2021
Maksim Yuryevich NOROK
1979
Boyarko Vladimir Nikolayevich
Krasnodar
07/07/2017
marijuana
repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
61107/21
09/12/2021
Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV
1959
Golubenko Andrey Yevgenyevich
Nea Skiony
22/11/2018
bribe-related crime
lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022
1497/22
02/12/2021
Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV
1980
16/11/2017
N-metilefedron
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls
Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
2812/22
24/11/2021
Andrey Igorevich DEMIN
1981
Korchagin Arseniy Sergeyevich
Yaroslavl
06/12/2018
heroin
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
10091/22
10/02/2022
Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV
1983
05/02/2019
N-methylephedrine
fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip
Supreme Court of Russia,
22/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
14928/22
15/02/2022
Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV
1983
05/05/2019
heroin
anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF UGURYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 40018/16 and 9 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Uguryan and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President, Gilberto Felici, Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in ten applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicants complained that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. 6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‐73, 17 January 2023). 7. The applicants complained principally that they had been unfairly convicted of drug offences which they had been incited by State agents to commit and that their plea of entrapment had not been properly examined in the domestic proceedings. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 8. The Court reiterates that absence in the national legal system of a clear and foreseeable procedure for authorising test purchases of drugs remains a structural problem which exposes applicants to an arbitrary action by the State agents and prevents the domestic courts from conducting an effective judicial review of their entrapment pleas (see Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10 and 2 others, 2 October 2012 and Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021). 9. The Court has consistently found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the deficient existing procedure for authorisation and administration of test purchases of drugs in the respondent State, an issue similar to that in the present case (see Veselov and Others, cited above, §§ 126‐28; Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, §§ 124‐25, 24 April 2014; Lebedev and Others v. Russia, nos. 2500/07 and 4 others, §§ 12‐16, 30 April 2015; and Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06 and 4 others, §§ 17‐21, 27 November 2014). 10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the criminal proceedings against the applicants were incompatible with a notion of a fair trial. 11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 12. Some applicants submitted other complaints under the Convention. In view of the Court’s findings above, it considers that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints raised by the applicants. 13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Kumitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018), the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present case. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(unfair conviction for an offence committed as a result of entrapment by State agents)
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of test purchase/
"operational experiment"
Type of offence
Specific grievances
Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date)
Case-law
40018/16
29/06/2016
Margar Norikovich UGURYAN
1977
25/11/2014
marijuana
lack of incriminating information
Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
57467/19
31/10/2019
Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA
1973
11/09/2018
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
12187/21
25/02/2021
Yunyuye SHEN
1957
Kulapov Vitaliy Viktorovich
Moscow
31/12/2017
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022. 30227/21
21/10/2021
Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV
1975
04/03/2016
ephedrine
repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale
Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
35368/21
24/06/2021
Maksim Yuryevich NOROK
1979
Boyarko Vladimir Nikolayevich
Krasnodar
07/07/2017
marijuana
repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
61107/21
09/12/2021
Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV
1959
Golubenko Andrey Yevgenyevich
Nea Skiony
22/11/2018
bribe-related crime
lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022
1497/22
02/12/2021
Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV
1980
16/11/2017
N-metilefedron
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls
Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
2812/22
24/11/2021
Andrey Igorevich DEMIN
1981
Korchagin Arseniy Sergeyevich
Yaroslavl
06/12/2018
heroin
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
10091/22
10/02/2022
Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV
1983
05/02/2019
N-methylephedrine
fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip
Supreme Court of Russia,
22/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
14928/22
15/02/2022
Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV
1983
05/05/2019
heroin
anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
No. Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of test purchase/
"operational experiment"
Type of offence
Specific grievances
Final domestic judgment (appeal/cassation court, date)
Case-law
40018/16
29/06/2016
Margar Norikovich UGURYAN
1977
25/11/2014
marijuana
lack of incriminating information
Rostov Regional Court, 10/05/2016
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
57467/19
31/10/2019
Aminat Magomedovna ABDURAKHMANOVA
1973
11/09/2018
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Astrakhan Regional Court, 30/05/2019
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
12187/21
25/02/2021
Yunyuye SHEN
1957
Kulapov Vitaliy Viktorovich
Moscow
31/12/2017
bribe-related offence
pressure to proceed with illegal activity
Supreme Court of Russia, 29/08/2022
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022. 30227/21
21/10/2021
Sergey Valeryevich BOKOV
1975
04/03/2016
ephedrine
repeated calls, the applicant was not known to the police as a drug dealer before the information given by the drug user, who then acted as a buyer, lack of incriminating information, no evidence that the applicant profited in any respect from the drug sale
Supreme Court of Russia, 27/12/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
35368/21
24/06/2021
Maksim Yuryevich NOROK
1979
Boyarko Vladimir Nikolayevich
Krasnodar
07/07/2017
marijuana
repeated calls, fellow drug user, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 25/03/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, drug-related crime:
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
61107/21
09/12/2021
Vadim Albertovich DENIYEV
1959
Golubenko Andrey Yevgenyevich
Nea Skiony
22/11/2018
bribe-related crime
lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 10/08/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022
1497/22
02/12/2021
Maksim Skayper Ogly ALIGULIYEV
1980
16/11/2017
N-metilefedron
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell, repeated calls
Supreme Court of Russia, 02/07/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
2812/22
24/11/2021
Andrey Igorevich DEMIN
1981
Korchagin Arseniy Sergeyevich
Yaroslavl
06/12/2018
heroin
fellow drug user, lack of incriminating information, pressure to sell
Supreme Court of Russia, 26/05/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
10091/22
10/02/2022
Maksim Aleksandrovich KONSTANTINOV
1983
05/02/2019
N-methylephedrine
fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip
Supreme Court of Russia,
22/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
14928/22
15/02/2022
Ruslan Abdulkhakimovich AMANZATOV
1983
05/05/2019
heroin
anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information
Supreme Court of Russia, 14/09/2021
Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021,
Yeremtsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 20696/06, 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07, 27 November 2014
