I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in POLAT v. TURKEY.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2019-05-07
  • Communication date: 2017-09-28
  • Application number(s): 64138/11
  • Country:   TUR
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, 10, 10-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.879792
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The application concerns the conviction of the applicant for six counts of disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation, under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, on account of his participation in six public meetings (demonstrations and concerts), during which he allegedly chanted slogans in favour of the PKK and its leader.
The applicant relies on Articles 6, 10 and 11 of the Convention.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of his conviction under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act ?

Judgment