I incorrectly predicted that there was a violation of human rights in XENOFONTOS v. CYPRUS.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2011-06-14
  • Communication date: 2020-09-15
  • Application number(s): 68725/16
  • Country:   CYP
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 8, 8-1, 14
  • Conclusion:
    Remainder inadmissible
    No violation of Art. 6-1
  • Result: No violation
  • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.588257
  • Prediction: Violation
  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The application concerns the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings instigated against the applicant on 25 August 2010 in view of the use at the trial of evidence obtained from F.H., by granting the latter immunity from prosecution, as well as the length of the said proceedings (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention).
On 13 June 2013 the Assize Court of Nicosia found the applicant guilty of, inter alia, premeditated murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment (criminal case αρ.
19325/10).
On 14 June 2013 the applicant filed an appeal with the Supreme Court (αρ.
103/13) challenging the Assize Court’s findings and the sentence imposed, which was dismissed on 6 June 2016.

Judgment