I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in MILETIĆ v. CROATIA.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2020-09-29
  • Communication date: 2018-02-22
  • Application number(s): 6919/16
  • Country:   HRV
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, P1-1
  • Conclusion:
    Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
  • Result: Violation
    • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.564418
  • Prediction: No violation

  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

The application concerns the deprivation of property stemming from the Government’s decision on restructuring and recovery of a commercial bank whereby the bank’s shareholders, including the applicant, were deprived of their shares, and the lack of access to court in that respect.
The applicant also complains that the Constitutional Court’s decision was not adequately reasoned because the main arguments in her constitutional complaint were not addressed.
The case is similar to the cases of Project-Trade d.o.o.
v. Croatia, no.
1920/14 and Scott Bader d.o.o.
v. Croatia, nos.
46998/15 and 24312/16, communicated to the Government on 1 February and 16 June 2017, respectively.

Judgment