I incorrectly predicted that there was a violation of human rights in PELEKI v. GREECE.

Information

  • Judgment date: 2020-03-05
  • Communication date: 2018-05-15
  • Application number(s): 69291/12
  • Country:   GRC
  • Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1, 6-3-a, 6-3-b
  • Conclusion:
    No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings
    Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
  • Result: No violation
  • SEE FINAL JUDGMENT

JURI Prediction

  • Probability: 0.528109
  • Prediction: Violation
  • Inconsistent


Legend

 In line with the court's judgment
 In opposition to the court's judgment
Darker color: higher probability
: In line with the court's judgment  
: In opposition to the court's judgment

Communication text used for prediction

Communicated on 15 May 2018 FIRST SECTION Application no.
69291/12Ekaterini PELEKIagainst Greecelodged on 22 October 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE In May 2007 the Hellenic Public Real-Estate Corporation (Κτηματική Εταιρία Δημοσίου – ΚΕΔ) and the Holy and Great Monastery of Vatopedi signed a deed by which they agreed to exchange two pieces of land.
By the said deed, the Holy and Great Monastery of Vatopedi became owner of a piece of land measuring 860,8 hectares situated near Ouranoupoli in Chalkidiki.
The applicant was the notary before whom the deed was signed.
In disciplinary proceedings against her, a disciplinary penalty (temporary cessation of functions) was imposed on her, on account of the fact that the land was protected under law no.
3028/2002 “for the protection of antiquities and of the cultural heritage in general” and, therefore, its transfer was not possible.
According to the applicant, the public prosecutor at the Disciplinary Council of First-Instance, after having made his submissions, did not retire at the end of the hearing but participated in the deliberations.
She complains under Article 6 about the disciplinary proceedings conducted against her.

Judgment