I incorrectly predicted that there's no violation of human rights in PAIXÃO MOREIRA SÁ FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL.
Information
- Judgment date: 2020-02-25
- Communication date: 2018-05-30
- Application number(s): 78108/14
- Country: PRT
- Relevant ECHR article(s): 6, 6-1
- Conclusion:
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings
Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings
Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings
Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage
Just satisfaction)
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage
Just satisfaction) - Result: Violation SEE FINAL JUDGMENT
JURI Prediction
- Probability: 0.656549
- Prediction: No violation
Inconsistent
Legend
Communication text used for prediction
The application concerns the applicant’s conviction by the Lisbon Court of Appeal for unauthorised recording of conversations, after he had been acquitted in first instance court.
It also concerns another decision of the Lisbon Court of Appeal confirming the penalty which had been applied to the applicant by the trial court at a subsequent stage of the proceedings.
It raises issues under Articles 6 § 1 and 8 of the Convention.